Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of points of interest in Kansas City, Missouri
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
what's up) 02:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
List of points of interest in Kansas City, Missouri
- List of points of interest in Kansas City, Missouri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per my reasoning at the ongoing
talk) 21:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Keep like the last time we did this. No new arguments have been introduced (we handled the "travel guide" argument last time). No new reason to delete, should be closed unless a new argument surfaces.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The topic does not appear well-defined, and could span hundreds or thousands of articles. I think that Category:Buildings and structures in Kansas City, Missouri suffices. --Odie5533 (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per WP:LISTPURP. The article is almost all blue links, except for 3 red links. The topics listed therein that have Wikipedia articles are likely to be inherently notable. Afterward, a merge to Kansas City, Missouri could be discussed on talk pages. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 04:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- It's over No need to relist the last AFD was a keep, and this one is at worst "no consensus" -- there is no reason to overturn or change from the previous AFD. Let's move on.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Useful to see all the notable places in a location. Notability can be established by items listed having blue links to their own articles, proving those entries have already met Wikipedia's requirements for notability, or they are listed as historic buildings/sites by the state or federal government, or are a museum, a notable park, whatever. Discuss things on the talk page if you see anything you don't believe should go there. Dream Focus 01:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.