Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game soundtracks released on vinyl (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

WP:LISTN is the applicable criterion here, and substantive evidence has been provided that this topics meets the criterion. Those arguing to keep are quite correct in stating that NLIST does not require every list entry to be discussed in reliable sources, only the group as a group. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

List of video game soundtracks released on vinyl

List of video game soundtracks released on vinyl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I understand that there may be information about the rise and popularity of issuing video game soundtracks on vinyl (as discussed in the History section), but that information can be incorporated into Video game music. Aside from that, there is not really a need for a list to include albums with such a trivial intersection. Of course, you can always claim "coverage" in the form of routine announcements (e.g., "X Game's Soundtrack Releases on Digital and Vinyl"), but that would set an unneeded precedent. Otherwise you could have articles such as "List of vinyl reissues" or "List of movie soundtracks released on vinyl" which both could have just as many "reliable" sources. The last nomination had fairly poor keep rationales (such as "vinyl releases are interesting these days"), so I am renominating. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Given the amount of coverage there is for every entry on the list (too much on a few if you ask me but that's another matter) and how reliable it all appears to be, I think notability overrides this concern about necessity here. The publications care a lot about reporting on these vinyl releases and it's hard to call that indiscriminate. Could use some cleanup and especially some
MOS:MAJORWORK attention but otherwise I don't see anything wrong here. QuietHere (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete: I agree that video game albums released on vinyl is a trivial intersection. This may work better as a category, but it is not really a defining characteristic either. I do not think "lots of reliable sources" is a good argument in this case to justify notability, when items on the list are mostly supported by run-of-the-mill routine announcements. RS can report on itmes we deem unimportant and trivial as well. Information about vinyl and video game music can be kept, but I do not see the necessity of keeping the list. OceanHok (talk) 14:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets
    WP:LISTN: the subject "has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". Sojourner in the earth (talk) 23:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment: While
    WP:LISTN is fairly vague, I don't believe that the criteria of has been discussed as a group or set has been met. There are sources discussing the concept and practice, and there are release announcements. I'm not seeing sources that actually attempt to tabulate a list of video game soundtracks on vinyl. Why? I Ask (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep the list is focussed and has focussed criteria for inclusion - see
    WP:LSC Lightburst (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep Meets
    WP:LISTN - concept has been discussed as a group in secondary sources. ResonantDistortion 10:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete. It's an indiscriminate list, type x of music release on type x of physical media. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per arguments in the first AFD, and per
    WP:LISTN
    criteria, and there are sources in the article that discuss the broader concept more generally. To make it easier on others; some of the specific sources currently cited in the article that I feel meet the criteria of discussing the concept as a group or set include (but are not limited to) the following:
    • Napolitano, Jayson (23 May 2012). "The Sound Card 007: Game music on vinyl". Destructoid. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
    • Diver, Mike (22 September 2015). "Vinyl Fantasy: How limited edition records are taking video game soundtracks to the next level". thevinylfactory.com. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
    • Beaumont-Thomas, Ben (27 August 2015). "Music: The Megadrive megamix – how classic videogame soundtracks went from background noise to cratedigger gold".
      theguardian.com
      . Retrieved 16 April 2016.
    • Greenwald, Will (30 March 2017). "The Wide World of Video Game Vinyl". Geek.com. Archived from the original on August 22, 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
~
problem solving 18:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nope, those sources really don't. Obviously, an article about video game soundtracks on vinyl is going to have examples, but that does mean they have been discussed as a whole set. Why? I Ask (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The coverage doesn't need to be a whole collective set though. We've got all sorts of video game library lists like List of PlayStation 4 games even though there's no other reliable source on the planet that lists all of the 1000s of released games. Why? Because there's no shortage of sources discussing its library in a general sense. Same applies here. Sergecross73 msg me 20:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not really comparable; the are tons of lists of PlayStation 4 games, not just articles that mention examples of games. And in this case, it would be more similar to "List of digital PlayStation 4 games", divided by medium. If it was just a "List of video game soundtracks" that just had a column listing the available mediums, that would be better. A lede discussing the use of each medium would be better too. Why? I Ask (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
From
problem solving 05:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
That's not discussing them as a group. It's simply name-dropping examples. And also from
WP:NLIST: there is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") which is what this is. Citing that as a be all end all is not helpful. For such a cross-categorization of "X of Y", there needs to be further proof that a list is justified. Why? I Ask (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@Then what would you look for in determining if something discusses something as a group or a set? How are you interpreting that criteria? ~
problem solving 16:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.