Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Beach Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long Beach Records

Long Beach Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure label. Geschichte (talk) 17:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not pass
  WP:NMG. Not a notable record label. No notable press or accomplishments.Behindthekeys (talk) 04:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (although not "per nom", as the nomination statement itself verges on the bizarre). But the
  avalable sources do not demonstrate that the label ever received sustained, independent coverage in reliable third-party: fails WP:NCORP. ——Serial 17:17, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.