Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Super Reyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Los Super Reyes

Los Super Reyes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails

• Los Super Reyes page shouldn't be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelo61 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have stricken this !vote because there is a second !vote with more rationale by the same editor below. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you guys don't know who they are then go to their myspace or mtv tr3s page or google Los Super Reyes and find out.
  • Their debut album is called El Regreso De Los Reyes go to billboard.com to find more info and they are coming out with a new album this year.
• Delete: Can find no evidence their only album ever charted. None of their singles have ever charted either.
  talk) 04:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak delete: Never heard of them before, but the same applies to like a million other groups. Pretty well-written, but without cleanup, it's a mess. --Kaizer13 (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non notable. JoannaMinogue (talk) 08:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep since Chelo61 gave a reference for their album charting, and since MGM encouraged me to separate the wheat from the chaff. A charting album on a major label, that's good enough. Thanks Mac. Delete since their only album hasn't charted (but it is on a major label), and there is no evidence given of notability. If the band goes, so should
  El Regreso De Los Reyes, their album. Drmies (talk) 19:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Their album
  MTV Tr3s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelo61 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • If you're interested in Wikipedia keeping this article, don't tell editors to Google something. This is an encyclopedia, not a chatroom. Add the relevant information from reliable sources to the article in the proper fashion. Oh, Google is not an authority. Drmies (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Here's a link of their album chart info billboard.comChelo61 (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do y'all want to delete Los Super Reyes?Chelo61 (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note--that's the fourth "don't delete" vote by Chelo61; I condensed his earlier three votes into one. He's also engaged in edit-warring in the article, twice reverting my cleanup efforts. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The Billboard link Chel061 provided is a valid source and it clearly establishes they had a charted album thus meeting inclusion criteria. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • A 130 peak on The Billboard 200 and a high peak on a genre list does not qualify per
    Wikipedia:Music#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. -- Jeandré, 2009-03-10t
    13:59z
    • How exactly doesn't that meet "Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart." As far as I can tell both those charts are national and the Billboard 200 is valid because it is based on sales information. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • They are national, but 130 is not notable (tho several top 20s may be). Hitting a genre list also doesn't make it notable. If doing these were notable there would have been reliable, published, third party news articles. -- Jeandré, 2009-03-11t14:05z
• Keep While I think that artists shouldn't have to have charted in order to be notable, thank you for supplying us with this. Hey, it's good enough for me now. --Kaizer13 (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per
  WP:BAND criterion #6, since this band has 2 members who were formerly members of the independently notable Kumbia Kings. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  08:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.