Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Erre XI has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
February 2009
WP:VG/GL, roster lists should be avoided, and instead they should be written in a prose, like below, that summarizes significant points about the roster! TRUCO 03:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:VG/GL which indicate roster lists are NOT to be included in these articles. ArcAngel (talk) 14:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Your edits to SvR
See
WP:GAMECRUFT SimonKSK 03:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
BTW, no consensus was decided on those lists so your message is false. SimonKSK 03:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. TRUCO503 22:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
WT:VG, where I started a discussion at the bottom of the page, to form a consensus on this matter, but for now it must be left at the original revision, which other articles are also abiding to, which is no roster lists.--<TRUCO>503
02:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
How come it was ok for the roster to be included but now it isn't.--<TRUCO>503[reply]
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SimonKSK 19:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Don not remove hidden comments. SimonKSK 21:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Edit war warning
While you don't appear to be in danger of violating
I am tired of reverting you. We told you to many times to stop. You will be blocked. SimonKSK 23:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Video game rosters
If you continue to re-add the rosters to wrestling videos, I will have no choice but to ask for you to be blocked for violating the
WT:VG to remove the rosters. If you have or had a problem with it then you should have took part in the discussion.--WillC 02:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I should be unblocked because I was doing something to help people get info on the roster for the game. It's not like I was destroying it!
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is a collaborative project; we make decisions together by
consensus. If you aren't willing to discuss your desired changes and get consensus for them, then you have to be blocked. When your block expires, you shouldn't make these changes unless other editors agree with you that they make the article better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No. We told you to stop doing it, per consensus. You reverted 19 times. You can only revert 3 times. SimonKSK 22:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, anyone can revert more than that - just not more than 3 times in a 24-hour period. :)
@Chelo - Your reasoning is faulty. Wikipedia is
not a game guide, that info can be found elsewhere on the web. ArcAngel (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
In general, when you get a warning on your talk page, you should stop, make sure you understand what other users object to, and discuss what you're doing. You should then make sure that other users make sure they agree with you before you continue. That's good advice no matter what's in the warning. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can't beleive you guys kept up how many times I edited it! Don't you guys have something better to do? Unblock me!
Hey, soemone listed your reverts in numerical order. You obviously can't listen. When you get unblocked, I hope that you will not go back to ading rosters. SimonKSK 23:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As per my comment on AN3, you shouldn't view this as a punishment. What you should do instead is take this time to read up on the relevant policies on Wikipedia, such as
WT:PW. The consensus is to leave them listed under Raw. WWE has never said the titles belong to ECW, they HAVE said that the WHC belongs to SmackDown. TJSpyke 21:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks I didn't knew how to.Chelo61 (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you also don't know that if you revert changes you need to give a reason to do so. Moreover, there is a rule that disallows three reverts in a 24-hr period, and I think you are on the verge of going there. You insist on adding redundant and unsourced information to an article you want other editors to keep. Your time would be better spent adding those "sources" you claim exist to the article, rather than reinserting instruments for the band members in the infobox--if you looked around, you would see that this is not common practice in Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was a good thing that in between all those "don't delete" votes you also supplied the reference for the band's album charting. I added that to both article and changed my vote to keep. Drmies (talk) 20:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your more recent edits
Re:
TheJazzDalek (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Just because some artist templates include unlinked text, that doesn't mean that it's correct. According to
TheJazzDalek (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Seriously, this back-and-forth thing has to stop. Discuss it on the
TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to TNA Impact! (video game). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Stop it, you know you are wrong on this. TJSpyke 00:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know that I am NOT wrong on this. I don't know who thought of taking the roster off but they should be included.Chelo61 (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You ARE wrong. As it has been pointed out MANY times on this page, the consensus at
WP:VG is to not include roster lists in article. This is a guideline covering all video game articles, if you disagree then you should bring it up there instead of vandalizing pages. TJSpyke 00:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
I am NOT wrong. How do I bring it up without "vandalizing"?Chelo61 (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The video game project decided that rosters lists don't go in articles, so you ARE wrong; plain and simple. Start a discussion at
WT:VG if you want the policy changed, until then you have to follow the policy whether you agree with it or not. You have been warned many times to stop. TJSpyke 01:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
01:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't have another account. I am not the only who wants the roster back.Chelo61 (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
June 2009
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-06-21t16:23z 16:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Los Super Reyes, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-06-25t12:55z 12:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Gonzales (Kumbia All Starz song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speedy Gonzales (Kumbia All Starz song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply