Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Again (Dua Lipa song)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Future Nostalgia. Sandstein 21:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Love Again (Dua Lipa song)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Love Again (Dua Lipa song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails
WP:NSONGS, all sources are from album reviews or articles about its parent album, Future Nostalgia therefore it should be redirected to Future Nostalgia. Cool Marc ✉ 16:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - the song charted in 5 separate countries. Is there really not a handful of sources out there to meet the WP:GNG? Sergecross73 msg me 16:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)]
- WP:NSONGS. There is no individual third-party coverage on this song. Cool Marc ✉ 17:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)]
- I’m very aware, I’m just saying, when a song has charted in so many countries, and the article has grown to almost 20k, it becomes increasingly less likely that there isn’t sourcing out there. I totally get it when a single’s only chart is at 97 in New Zealand, and the article is two sentences long. But in these cases I’m more hesitant to jump to your conclusion, generally speaking. Sergecross73 msg me 17:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- the 20k size is a WP:QUOTEFARM from sources that are all from album reviews and interviews about the album Future Nostalgia which doesn't indicate individual notability of "Love Again". Cool Marc ✉ 17:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)]
- the 20k size is a
- I’m very aware, I’m just saying, when a song has charted in so many countries, and the article has grown to almost 20k, it becomes increasingly less likely that there isn’t sourcing out there. I totally get it when a single’s only chart is at 97 in New Zealand, and the article is two sentences long. But in these cases I’m more hesitant to jump to your conclusion, generally speaking. Sergecross73 msg me 17:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Future Nostalgia: Per nominator. It's not necessary for every song in the album to have its own article. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 17:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to the parent album, per nominator. — Status (talk · contribs)
- Redirect to the aforementioned album, per nominator. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.