Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynda Mason Green

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the sources provided are about Ms. Green in any substance. They are the very definition of trivial mentions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lynda Mason Green

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. Deprodded by another editor. No evidence of secondary sources. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these prods should have been allowed to stay. These are articles lacking secondary sources that in no way come even remotely close to meeting inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles, or exempted from having to have
reliable sources to support Wikipedia articles, just because the article has a list of roles in it — even just getting an actor over NACTOR #1, the only notability criterion potentially in play here, still requires sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 00:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: The subject passes
WP:NACTOR. I've been searching for sources, and there are a lot of hits at newspapers.com, which I am sifting through. Some of them appear to provide some coverage that goes beyond mere mentions, especially for the subject's role in Ramona. The following source I found through "google scholar", and it provides some brief coverage regarding the Ramona role: http://cinemacanada.athabascau.ca/index.php/cinema/article/download/4018/4054. I'll get some articles clipped and provide them here as soon as I can. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Here are a couple of articles: here and here. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.