Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Bennett (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Bennett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no significant activities, no non-local references DGG ( talk ) 03:52, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a simple factoid. I am not adverse to seeing United Way leaders on here but properly cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilyharris (talk • contribs) 18:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

SarahStierch (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete, I do not see any notability according to

WP:N. It is not clear why this person is notable, all references are local.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.