Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Kowz
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mad Kowz
- Mad Kowz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable gang that fails
WP:ORG. Lack of substantial coverage by reliable sources. Found mentions of the group in reliable sources, mostly connected to a single person, but the coverage was about him, not the gang. No real coverage of the group. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Appears to be small-time street outfit, mostly mentioned incidentally in connection with one individual. Middayexpress (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very little mention in news. No reliable sources in general Google search. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.