Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline Bell (hospital executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Madeline Bell (hospital executive)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

WP:BASIC. Forbes is one article that could count. But other than that, sources are either not reliable or not independent. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I removed the Forbes ref. They produce a huge number x of y articles and its not-notable. In 2018, they produced 1471 of them, so they are very poor quality, as a ref scope_creep^Talk 20:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. CEO of a significant institution, subject of reliable source coverage from the
Philadelphia Inquirer and health industry publications. Gamaliel (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Not only female CEO of a significant institution, but also serves on the boards of several influential and important institutions such as the Philadelphia Fed. Merrilee (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. I retired after a 3 decades career in healthcare administration, mostly centered in hospitals. I can tell you I have never heard of a hospital CEO being a nurse; the position is ALWAYS held by a physician. This fact alone leads me to believe that the biography is of an exceptionally notable person. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I can understand the concern here, but the sources and notable contribution get the subject across the line for me. I like to see some more substance in the article (especially for a BLP) but I think the subject meets our inclusion criteria. St★lwart¹¹¹ 01:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per
WP:BASIC notability for a standalone article. Beccaynr (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: Now richly and adequately sourced.--Ipigott (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: These trade publications certainly pass for RS. --WomenProj (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Very well! There is a clear consensus then. This was being moved to and fro from drafts; now that we are clear at AFD, that should also be settled and page should stay at mainspace. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and agree with Nomadicghumakkad to keep the article in mainspace. It looks solid. -- econterms (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.