Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Cook

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 09:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Cook

Madison Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No major roles in any major film, or other evidence of notability . DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clear non-notable vanity. Could have been speedy. X4n6 (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It appears that user(s) above may be trying to subvert the vote process. Using almost identical language, it is highly likely the 2 users are the same person. I'll leave it to an admin or someone else to clean up the format issues with the user(s) above. But more importantly, to expand on my Delete vote, subject fails
    WP:BASIC. What else is there? Like her twin sister, Jordan Cook's article - which is also currently nominated for deletion - this is just another poorly written, unreferenced and blatant vanity article that should have been speedy deleted from the start. X4n6 (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.