Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandini (Singer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Mandini (Singer)
- Mandini (Singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparent
notable singer. No indications of any record releases, and therefore certainly no indications of any airplay, awards, etc. Speedy deletion declined so here we are. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
]
- Speedy delete no major label, no major songs, no major... anything. Being the spawn of a (barely) notable person does not mean they should have a page. This should have been speedied, and ]
- Redirect to Gigi Zancheta. I can't find anything other than that they have the relationship. Adam9007 (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete I've searched for sourcing and can find no evidence of notability.. Redirecting a BLP to another BLP without a very strong reason to do so is troublesome. INVALIDBIO does not call for it to be done, it points out that two non-notable children redirect to their respective parents, which in both of those cases make sense, the children of two of the world' most famous celebrities will likely be searched for and recreated if a red link. We have no reason to think that would be the case here. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete What is the CCS here? Being born to someone famous in 99.9% of circumstances is not going to be a CCS. Every person is born, doesn't make it special or significant because their parents have a Wikipedia article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)]
- Speedy delete This article is not well done at all and could easily go.TH1980 (talk) 22:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No RSes found with either Google or Google news search. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, couldn't find a thing, and the "(Singer)" disambiguation makes it completely inappropriate for a redirect Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Zero evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.