Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Faye Parney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Faye Parney

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE search of proper media archives, I'm not finding much to salvage it with -- I found a few hits of "local woman does stuff" in Saskatoon's local media, but nothing that would support a meaningful notability claim under NMUSIC, and mainly I just found concert listings.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to get over GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't even find mention of her in media sources, no album reviews; I don't think the regional music awards give her notability here in wiki. I can't find album reviews or any critical coverage of her music. Best I could find was a performance listing at Expo in Japan in 2005 or 2007 [1], see page Q... This appears PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: She appears to have been active in the 1990s, so it's hard to find sources. Library and Archives Canada has this [2], she seems to have been featured on a CBC television item back in the 1990s, but I have no information of how extensive it is... Oaktree b (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Tried searching .ca and .jp websites, only have confirmation of her performance at the Expo in Aichi, Japan. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete She doesn’t seem to have the necessary sources and coverage, but I’m open to keeping the article if those sources can be found. Go4thProsper (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.