Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Chambers (Mayor of Carbon Hill, Alabama)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Chambers (Mayor of Carbon Hill, Alabama)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BLP1E too. Chambers is a jerk but the world is full of them. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable under NPOL nor does he approach GNG outside of what is a clear BLP1E. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep passes
talk) 02:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Clearly doesn't pass Fails
WP:BLP1E situation. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete except for this 15-minute claim to fame, there's nothing about him. I say we kill off his article for his poor use of phrasal verbs too. "kill out" has to do with curing tobacco.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear
WP:BLP1E also applies. John from Idegon (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Carbon Hill is not even remotely close to large enough to make its mayors automatically notable just for existing as mayors — and although his comments were certainly tasteless and classless, the blip of "kill them out" coverage just makes him a
ten-year test for the purposes of earning a permanent place in an encyclopedia. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Does not seem notable. He is having his fifteen minutes of fame, and is otherwise not notable.--''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 06:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with previous arguments per
WP:BLP1E; the subject is notable for only one event, and the event is not significant. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per everyone else. This is total garbage. Praxidicae (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — per arguments above. livelikemusic talk! 12:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a total violation of not news, especially considering how easy it is for people in this day and age to rashly post their feelings for all to see, there is no justification for the article. I will not even get into the problematic and unblanaced and biased coverage the article itself provides.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mayors are not inherently notable and this one seems to only be so due to a
WP:BLP1E. Chetsford (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.