Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Henry Sherman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Henry Sherman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have marked page as reading like a cv and being overly promotional in tone, but I also doubt that Sherman is notable enough for a standalone. Fails

WP:GNG in my opinion. Dr42 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an overly promotional article on a non-notable businessperson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not overly concerned about the promotional/CV tone of the article, that could be fixed, but when I searched for significant coverage in reliable sources that would confer notability on this individual, I found none. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.