Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayowa Adenekan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mayowa Adenekan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another non-notable bio.

Ref bombed with articles that anyone can get made for them. Nswix (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Nswix (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Advertising. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Keep: The page has citations from notable and credible media houses. Bear in mind that the subject is from a third world country with media gagging. Putting that in context in mind, the citations are good enough. Amaekuma (talk) 08:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete refbombed with lots of links to various stories but overall lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obviously doesn't pass
WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I couldn'see anything that make this article notable. The sources are mostly advertorials and cannot be use as RS for

WP: GNG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.