Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne International Festival of Brass
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Melbourne International Festival of Brass
- Melbourne International Festival of Brass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. a non notable event that only gets 7 gnews hits in over 7 years of existence [1]. none of the coverage is international indicating this is hardly a widely recognised international event. LibStar (talk) 02:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 03:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - How, if it has seven gnews hits, can you say that it fails WP:GNG? Having seven gnews hits is usually prima facie evidence of passing the GNG. Admittedly, the ABC one is just a radio playlist (insignificant), and the SMH one is a trivial mention, but two of the Age articles definitely pass the "significant coverage" threshold. The article needs improvement, not deletion. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- simple, it purports to be a major festival attracting international acts but averages one news story a year, most of which merely confirms its existence. that is hardly significant, if it started in 2010 and had 7 gnews hits, then perhaps. LibStar (talk) 04:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The GNG doesn't specify any minimum temporal density of reliable secondary sources - it sets the bar at one. You'll have to argue something other than GNG if you don't think this article should be kept.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- simple, it purports to be a major festival attracting international acts but averages one news story a year, most of which merely confirms its existence. that is hardly significant, if it started in 2010 and had 7 gnews hits, then perhaps. LibStar (talk) 04:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Agree with Yeti hunter article needs improvement not deletion. Seven Gnews hits doesnt equal to it failing ]
- Delete, no evidence of notability has been presented.--Grahame (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Also concur with Yeti hunter article needs improvement and not deletion. It is poorly written, lacks external links to other music festivals in the City of Melbourne.--Whiteguru (talk) 10:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't evidence linking it significantly with other festivals, it lacks coverage and we don't create articles which average one article every year of existence. LibStar (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources are available:
- www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/15/1060871759617.html
- www.theage.com.au/news/business/scheme-of-note-has-volunteer-trumpeting-its-worth/2006/05/24/1148150325510.html
- trove.nla.gov.au/work/14915853?q=%22Melbourne+International+Festival+of+Brass%22&c=collection
- www.onlymelbourne.com.au/melbourne_details.php?id=12547
- Unscintillating (talk) 01:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.