Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetalJesusRocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MetalJesusRocks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable YouTuber, the only good source I could find was this article in Shacknews, everything I found was either unreliable, in passing or an interview. Devonian Wombat (talk) 14:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. To be honest, while we can't find that many sources, I think he deserves a stub. If this article was much longer then that might be a problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seungri400 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That makes zero sense. You didn't even cite a reason. Sergecross73

While I am trying to find at least some sources about his work, there just aren't any. I believe he is one of those individuals who has excellent work on video game collecting and the retro gaming scene. There are a number of

video games related personalities we cannot find any cite-able sources about their work. However their contributions are so important that they deserve an entry here. One such example I can think of right now is bruce dawson of original xbox team, whose work in writing a virtual machine of the original xbox for the new Xbox 360 deserves to be documented. But there is no mention of him/his work.User:N013i

That's not how it works on Wikipedia. Reliables sources are a non-negotiable requirement, especially for a

WP:BLP. Sergecross73 msg me 17:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I have added some of his works which were reported by some news sites. Please forgive my dialect as English is not my first language and If my sentences are not coherent User:N013i--~Nabeel~N013i 18:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC) .[reply]

Most of those sources would not be considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. The two exceptions are Vice and Ars Technica...but those sources are mostly small passing mentions in articles largely not focused on him. Not really the type of stuff you can write a whole article around. Sergecross73 msg me 18:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable youtuber. Article does not have any reliable sources. HelpingWorld (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - poorly sourced
WP:BLP. Sergecross73 msg me 04:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Weak delete Based on the current revision of the article's quality and sources. However, there is a decent amount of coverage found on Google News. I am not sure if the this subject meets GNG or not. RoseCherry64 (talk) 08:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet
talk) 12:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I'm a fan of MetalJesusRocks, but the sourcing just isn't there. -- Mike 🗩 15:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly sourced article not meeting GNG or NBIO. -Cupper52^Discuss! 16:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.