Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metfem2d

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Metfem2d

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails

WP:NSOFTWARE. - Mr X 18:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete I was unable to find any independent references for this software at Google, GBooks, or GScholar. --Mark viking (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking independent references. A search revealed no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.