Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micah Spear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Micah Spear

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:SPA. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as I concur, everything is especially simply unsuitable or simply not convincing as it is, none of it amounts to genuine substance regardless of anything that could be insinuated about this. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mentions in promotional media do not establish notability. "artwork has been featured in publications such as …" does not rise to the level of "substantial part of a significant exhibition", "significant critical attention" or "permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums". Fails
talk) 22:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Fails
WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 02:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.