Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Finger Protests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Finger Protests Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable organization that clearly fails

• Delete Non notable - insubstantial RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Clearly notable. There is enough in depth coverage and the org has been behind some of the very important cases in india. Has credible and reliable sources.
  AfD. [reply
  ]

Above user is the creator of the article and has been canvassing to this AFD.[1]

talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep - it is a little difficult to see the notability because there are some sources that are marginal, primary (based on press releases) or not actually about the organisation, but I believe the coverage is sufficient for ORGDEPTH. --bonadea contributions talk 13:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not difficult at all and there are no sources to establish any notability.

talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

There are enough sources to establish notability only if you take into account the citations/references.ThisMr (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as promotional article failing
  talk) 15:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete non notable organization as does not have any significant coverage other than primary sources. Fails
  WP:ORGDEPTH --Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 20:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as fails
  WP:ORGDEPTH and promotional. MT Train^Discuss 05:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as
  talk|c|em) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Could you shed some light on the close connection? It will be really enlightening for the community.ThisMr (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.