Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Kompon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Mike Kompon
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mike Kompon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails
WP:NHOCKEY
. He played a combined total of 141 games in the AHL and DEL, leaving him 59 games short of the 200 mark needed to pass #2. He also has no preeminent honours to pass #3 while his college honours are not enough to pass #4.
It is now a question of whether or not he passes
WP:GNG. The article currently has five references, one of which is a permanent dead link. Tay87 (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Weak delete I only got a look at 2 of the sources listed (since I read neither german nor japanese), but only the first one was independent and it is borderline significant (it gives a brief history of his career). If the german and japanese sources are more indepth,then I think he passes GNG. Rockphed (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY. The coverage is routine sports reporting of transactions involving him and fails to show the GNG is met.Sandals1 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.