Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohan Lal Lohia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A marginal case, but there is clearly no consensus to delete the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohan Lal Lohia

Mohan Lal Lohia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less notable father of a more notable son - attempted notability by reverse inheritance.

Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Keep... Co-founded a significant company [1], and is named in the Panama papers. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd thought that
Iskandar323 (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Lohia family, which I just created. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Thanks to
    WP:GNG. He founded a large corporation and a multi-billionaire dynasty. Died in 2017, so no real promotional issues as we see with too many business articles. Edwardx (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.