Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouhamed Niang

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  13:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mouhamed Niang

Mouhamed Niang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. No appearances in fully-pro league. The only cup game for Thistle was against non-FPL opponent. BlameRuiner (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He made 14 appearances for Montrose in Scottish League One, how is this not a pro league? Also his appearance for Thistle in the cup was also against Montrose who as I’ve already said are in a professional football league, League One. I see this may be a rule on wiki but I don’t understand how this is the case ?Partickthistle123 (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - @
WP:FPL as only the top 2 tiers of Scottish football can be deemed to "professional". It's the same with that cup game as Montrose was in League One at the time. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.