Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Kesse (Blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nana Kesse (Blogger)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self created autobiography - has previously been speedily deleted so I am nominating for AfD and suggest salting. All the references provided are self published, suggesting use of wikipedia for self promotion. Melcous (talk) 05:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional autobiography. Not every blogger is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete fails
WP:GNG. Also, claims made in the article is not fully backed by the references cited. Ex: the 3rd reference about NK Foundation and would neither be considered as reliable as they would be via primary sources. TopCipher (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A primary sourced promotional autobiography. Notability is not inherited from birthday messages, nor gained from what one says about oneself. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is a purely promotional bio that fails both
talk) 15:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Lacks independent coverage needed for notability. Searching found his blog material and some articles where he is quoted. Gab4gab (talk) 15:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't meet
WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.