Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native Instruments
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep
]Native Instruments
- Native Instruments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This AfD was created by
]- Keep important music software co, their titles are often reviewed in major magazines! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figmentary (talk • contribs) 21 September 2010
- Keep. They actually are a pretty "big" company in the electronic music and music technology field, and their products get quite frequent coverage in industry publications such as Mix Magazine and Sound on Sound. We seem to have some articles on their individual products such as Guitar Rig and Traktor which seem to have some sources. Some of these product articles should maybe be merged to the main company article. --KFP (contact | edits) 21:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - very well-known German electronic music company. Plenty of coverage in mags such as MixMag, ]
- Strong keep - No question of the company's notability in the music production world. Strange to see this one contested. AtticusX (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Major company, has received coverage in independent sources. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.