Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Græger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Græger

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable scholar, tagged since 2010, no improvmnt Loew Galitz (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Has more than a few hits in Gbooks, not sure how notable they are. Oaktree b (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could the nominator elaborate why the scholar is nonnotable? Geschichte (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google Scholar shows articles by a Nina Græger [1] but this scholar is at the University of Copenhagen and her home page doesn't mention either the Journal listed on the page nor the Norwegian institute she presumably is employed at. Either the information in the article is wrong (and it is not backed up by sources) or we have two people with the same name, only one of which can I find academic output for. Lamona (talk) 03:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - in 2019 she moved from Oslo, Norway to the University of Copenhagen (and I put the information provided by the department into her page). No comment yet on notability, but I will see what I can find about coverage of her work on diplomacy and Scandinavian countries. DaffodilOcean (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neither her citation record nor her administrative position as head of department stand out as something that could pass
WP:PROF. Web searches found nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I agree. Fails
WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Post-close comment: For academics,
WP:NPROF works around GNG, because citing a work is the way that academics give another academic sigcov, so to speak. Geschichte (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.