Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Hertfordshire League

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

North Hertfordshire League

North Hertfordshire League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was dePRODed back in 2006 when any football league that ever existed at any point anywhere was presumed to be notable regardless of the level of coverage received. General consensus now is that leagues below level 11 need to pass

WP:GNG to have an article. My newspaper searches of "North Hertfordshire League" and "North Herts Football League" did not yield any significant coverage nor did the same searches attempted through search engines. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't really see this advancing beyond what it already is, delete per nom for failing GNG. Govvy (talk) 14:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Low level, Sub-county level, purely local interest only. Nigej (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.