Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Milburn

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article meets

WP:NAUTHOR, as demonstrated post-improvements by David Eppstein. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Olivia Milburn

Olivia Milburn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria at

WP:ACADEMIC. The Book Award isn't really prestigious, to my knowledge. She's not highly regarded in the field (perhaps decades down the road) and isn't a holder of a distinguished chair at a major university.  White Whirlwind  咨  06:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.