Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Om nom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete with no prejudice to recreation as a redirect. nancy ^(talk) 18:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Om nom

Om nom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

Non-notable neologism; either delete or redirect to something. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sounds like a joke! This is a weird neologism, and is impending AfD food.
  ♫♪ 07:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Nn meme, and no content/links to prove otherwise. --Twinzor (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Om nom nom it as non-notable Internet meme. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Om nom is pretty much synonymous with lolcats - redirect it there.
  talk) 16:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Om is where the heart is (sorry, couldn't resist) -- Delete. More neologism shenanigans.
  talk) 20:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Transwiki to Wiktionary per
  Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms and/or Merge into Cookie Monster. Is there any mechanism in the MediaWiki software to track how often a given page is viewed? I came to this because I saw Om nom used and wanted to know what it meant. I wonder how often other people have wanted to know the same thing? Do we have any way to find out? In any case, a redirect is cheap, so leaving one behind pointing to Cookie Monster seems like the right thing to do, since that would get people the answers they seek when the search for om nom (as long as Cookie Monster gets augmented with the information about the colloquial usage. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=om+nom

• D is for delete that's good enough for me. JuJube (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm tempted to Let it
  WP:SNOW. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 02:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per (om) nom. Grutness...wha? 02:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  om nom nom nom currently does. Kyz (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, no evidence for notability. Same goes for
  om nom nom nom. -Colfer2 (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.