Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Vacation Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Vacation Media

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable Russian company, the article is very promotional. James Richards 02:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete potential advert. LibStar (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but ti rewrite. 11:36, 02 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.181.1.83 (talk)
Weak delete. I like having articles on publishers as it helps estabilish reliability of sources, but they still must meet
WP:NORG. This one doesn't do so, and as it is very new (2017), I doubt it can. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.