Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Child
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 11:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)]
One Child
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- One Child (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Borderline, but I don't think it meets ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Lack of refs before did make it a delete, but I think I have added enough to show that it meets notability. Was a best selling paperback, has been quoted in research. Author is certainly notable, and as this is her first book. User:Davidstewartharvey
- Keep. Two academic reviews, one already linked, I found one more at [1] (page 91, several paragraphs long, text at LibGen). I suggest User:Boleyn withdraws this now. FYI both reviews were very easy to find using LibGen search, I used the phrase '"One Child" hayden'. I suggest using this search engine in addition to Google ones, it is pretty solid for finding academic reviews. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination per excellent comments above. Thanks for the tip on LibGen. Boleyn (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.