Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Rugby League Competition

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. all except Ontario Rugby Union which is keep. SpinningSpark 21:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Rugby League Competition

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also included in this discussion;

2013 Ontario Rugby League season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2014 Ontario Rugby League season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010 Ontario Rugby League season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2011 Ontario Rugby League season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toronto City Saints (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Niagara Bobcats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toronto Centurions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ontario Rugby Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Does not satisfy

WP:GNG or any claim of significance, with no references. Google only brings up First party links and listings. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the other articles for inclusion in this discussion.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of rugby union-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I feel
    Rugby League
    are two distinct sports. I'm fine with deleting the Rugby League articles, however I oppose the deletion of the ORU article, as it's the top-level governing body of the sport in Ontario. While you're correct that searching "Ontario Rugby Union" verbatim does not produce much, searching the championship name, and trophy name, shows wide coverage:
Grande (talk) 06:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
this should be listed in its own AfD. LibStar (talk) 04:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the article on the Ontario Rugby Union. As a sub-union of Rugby Canada, it is considered part of a 'High Performance Rugby Union' as referenced in
    Wikipedia:NRU . While that guideline refers to sports persons, it stands to reason that if a person is considered notable, the provincial governing body of the sport itself is notable. Google brings up a great deal more information if you search by the more commonly used name of the ORU: 'Rugby Ontario' https://www.google.ca/#tbm=nws&q=%22Rugby+Ontario%22 SkyGuy747 (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose (Keep) — per reasons given by Grande and SkyGuy. Barryjjoyce (talk) 04:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Rugby league is a very low level amateur game in Canada. any competition also has that status. LibStar (talk) 04:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed; delete the rugby league articles, but keep the rugby union one, Ontario Rugby Union. They shouldn't have been included in the same AfD. Grande (talk) 14:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ontario Rugby Union, delete the rest. That is not even the same sport as the rest.-MacRùsgail (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This article is on rugby league which is not the same sport as rugby union. I am therefore removing it from the rugby union deletion listing and replacing it with rugby league. -MacRùsgail (talk) 19:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC) [edit to add - No I'm not - I see the nominator has listed an RU article amongst the RL ones. NOT THE SAME SPORT!!!][reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of rugby league-related deletion discussions
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakrtalk / 20:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.