Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open source CRM software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Open source CRM software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since its creation, this page doesn't seem to have improved itself. It's still unsourced, but has grown to include quite a few redlink (and likely non-notable) pages. —fetch ·comms 23:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Removing the redlinks and external links is easy enough, and I've done so. It's unclear whether this list provides anything of value that Category:Free customer relationship management software doesn't. —Korath (Talk) 18:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to List of Open source CRM software to reflect the article's actual content. This isn't an article about open source CRM. It's a list of the software. -- Whpq (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's a list but most of the entries are not notable, thus it's an unnecessary list article. Just went through and prodded most of them for lack of
sources (and speedied one which had been deleted via discussion and recreated with no improvement).--137.122.49.102 (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per 137.122.49.102 --Nuujinn (talk) 23:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.