Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling for the 1949 Canadian federal election

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to 1949 Canadian federal election. Consensus here shows Merge to be the least objectionable result. Owen× ☎ 20:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the 1949 Canadian federal election

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Also wp:not. Only "Stats only" sources. North8000 (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I did this for 4 of these articles at the same time: Opinion polling for the 1958 Canadian federal election, Opinion polling for the 1980 Canadian federal election, Opinion polling for the 1949 Canadian federal election and Opinion polling for the 1945 Canadian federal election North8000 (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Every single other election with available polling in Canadian history has a similar page, with a similar scope of sources. If they are to be deleted, it would have to be up to the 2021 election, and the practice in most elections has been to have a polling page. CharlotteWhitton (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I'm baffled why this was created as a stand-alone article rather than within
WP:SPLIT. Reywas92^Talk 23:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge per Reywas92. We only need a separate opinion polling article for an election if there are, or are likely to be, a large number of polls to include. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Reywas92. —Joeyconnick (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.