Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opusten ko Lexaurin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 18:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opusten ko Lexaurin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album appears to be non-notable, due to lack of substantial RS coverage. Zero refs. Tagged as non-notable for well over 3 years. Also tagged as an orphan. Epeefleche (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – After several searches, I haven't found significant coverage in reliable sources to qualify this topic's inclusion in Wikipedia. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 18:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable, failing
WP:GNG. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.