Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orato
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lack of participation would normally be a relist or soft delete, but the article in its current form is a blatant G11. There is some less promotional content in the article history, but even that clearly fails notability. The WordsmithTalk to me 22:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Orato
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Orato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads like an advertisement for the company, cites no sources other than own website, fails
WP:SIRS DirtyHarry991 (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Companies. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.