Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis Dozovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Otis Dozovic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable wrestler. He is just a develoment talent in WWE's farm territory. Just had a few matches. Too soon for this article. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - wrestler is an active member of WWE's televised roster, article has significant independent coverage. Dannys-777 (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "significant independent coverage" looks like wp:routine. Most of the sources are just a few televised matches. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Looking through the page and the sources I think its enough to meet
WP:GNG. Although he might not meet it for professional or amateur, I think combined there is enough. - Galatz ^Talk 17:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Not particularly notable as a pro wrestler (
yet) but might be notable for that and everything else combined.LM2000 (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.