Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Here Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out Here Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no references cited since 2006 Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found one ref: a review on NPR of a compilation they put out. NPR's definitely something, but that's only one piece of coverage, and it's about one of their products and not the label itself. — Gwalla | Talk 04:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me

21 00:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. I can't find substantial RS coverage to meet GNG, or that it otherwise meets our notability criteria. Some other articles, which likely should be deleted, depend on this article for notability. We can't have an otherwise NN band depend on an otherwise NN record producer for notability.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the NPR article, while reliable, doesn't have this label as it's prime topic, only one of its releases. I was able to find some scattered coverage of material that the label has released, but nothing about the label itself, which would lead me to believe they don't meet
WP:CORP. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC).[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.