Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Sitanggang

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Sitanggang

Paolo Sitanggang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails

WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
criterion for speedy deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
WP:A7.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:BLPSOURCES refers to the inclusion of material in an article, not the creation or deletion thereof. Also, none of the material in this article is particularly contentious. Despite the poor sourcing, no one is calling the veracity of the article into question. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
According to
WP:BLPPROD articles created without any sources after march 18 2010 should be proposed for deletion, and that PROD can not be removed unless reliable sources are added. Also I do not think any of the claims in the article are notable, just been a player of a team that does not play in a fully professional league is not notable, but since you ask, and just in case, I have removed the Speedy. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
The one external link supports the single sentence (even though it is a wiki), therefore
WP:BLPPROD is not applicable. — Jkudlick tcs 01:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paolo_Sitanggang&oldid=1070617284"