Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patryk Wezowski (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patryk Wezowski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This still needs better revisiting and attention as not only am I confirming my PROD: "Although apparent with information and sources, the coverage is not convincing of the needed substantial significant coverage for his own independent notable article and the information is simply about the press and events he's been involved with. My own searches have actually found nothing better at all and he's also certainly not notable as an author as WorldCat only shows 55 library holdings. There's also no merge or move target so there's nothing to suggest the history contents can at least be saved thus, with this questionability, deletion is the best option.", there's still nothing convincing as the 1st AfD suggested those listed links there were not convincing enough. Notifying 1st AfD commenters Piotrus, Ohnoitsjamie and Jodi.a.schneider and also AfC accepter Tachs. SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 07:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Sources and arguments for keep from the last AfD were weak and came from one (SPA?) or more new editors, likely connected to the subject. This is still as much of a vanity bio now as it was before. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable public speaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nominator, not a notable subject. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 15:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.