Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playscripts, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Playscripts, Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:CORPDEPTH as routine business announcements. I was unable to find any additional sources. shoy (reactions) 15:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found some other references in a BEFORE, however, they are fleeting and routine coverage that don't help establish
WP:CORPDEPTH. Chetsford (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Like the others, I find passing references and press releases, but no "significant coverage" to the subject itself. Ravenswing 18:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A couple of modestly substantial sources about the company: the second half of a 2005 theater column from
American Theatre Magazine [2]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. A promotional directory listing accompanied by a link farm. No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I'll add that notability isn't inherited and there are no indications of notability of this company. The references fail the criteria for establishing notability and are either mentions-in-passing or rely on quotations from company owners. Fail GNG and
HighKing⁺⁺ 18:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.