Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podjournalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find much evidence this term really exists outside of one person's use. Google doesn't give much: [1] [2]. NicM 10:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it's a dictdef in any case; but it certainly smells like a
  bollocks neologism. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 10:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per above. Melchoir 10:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --
  Talk 13:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge with podcast, if required at all. -- (aeropagitica)  15:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as more Podbollocks. Dan 19:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. 15 hits on refined Google search. Might deserve a mention in the Podcasting genres article in planning to merge all the foocasting articles. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-05 22:59Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.