User talk:Segv11
![]() | Segv11 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, using headlines when starting new topics,and signing your message, using ~~~~.
I will post my responses on this page. Please have a registered account, and I will also leave a note on your talk page. Otherwise, please indicate that you will watch this page for a response. I will not respond by email, IRC, IM, or any other method that is not visible to the Wikipedia community as a whole.
If I left a note on your talk page, then I'll also watch your talk page for a few days. Feel free to respond there or here, as you prefer. :)
Welcome back!
Hi Segv11, I noticed you came back from a wikibreak. Welcome back! I think you would make a great administrator, though you should become active again before going through RFA. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-26 10:18Z
- I'm only partially back from wikibreak, and Real Life promises to keep me quite busy for the perceivable future. I wouldn't dream of going through RfA until I can give more time to wikipedia. (That's why I removed wannabe-admin from my userboxes...) Thank you for your vote of confidence though. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 19:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:CIE1931simple.png
Thanks for uploading Image:CIE1931simple.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
- This image was made by editing a PD image already on wiki commons. This info was in fact in the image's edit history. An appropriate tag has been added to the image description page.
Missing Greek characters
I think some of the upper-case Greek letters are missing from the list in the Characters section of Language recognition chart. If I remember my high school Greek, the alphabet starts Alpha, Beta, Gamma ... and the list starts with Gamma. There are other letters missing too, like Epsilon, Zeta, Mu, Nu and others. You seem to know your Greek and I'm not good at generating non-Latin characters on my keyboard. Do you think you could find the time to fix that? Thanks! Truthanado 02:45 23 March 2007
Template:Infobox Montreal Metro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Segv11. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Segv11. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Berkeley Review of Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)