Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predrag Koluvija

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Predrag Koluvija

Predrag Koluvija (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia's

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as nom. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Crime, and Serbia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:BLP1E. Batmanthe8th (talk) 19:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment: the individual in question seems non-notable by himself, but the case seems to have received significant coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], among others. Would it not be an option to rename the article to Predrag Koluvija case or something along those lines and expand a bit on the criminal case itself, while retaining a brief subsection with Koluvija's basic biographical details? Ostalgia (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Eventify. The case itself seems to have quite a bit of significant coverage (even English language coverage of subsidiary cases exists). As
  WP:1E notes, When an individual is significant for their role in a single event,... [t]he general rule is to cover the event, not the person. The event is clearly notable—it's a major national case in Serbia—and I think some of this text could be used to get our article on that case started. This might be best done by a draft, or alternatively by bold editing in the mainspace, but I don't think deletion is the option here.— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion of rename and event notability should be further explored and refined.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, just shift focus onto event. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Title suggestion: maybe something like 2019 Serbian drug farm case? PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to consider delete vs 'eventify' (what a word).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• (Nominator) - No objection to "eventifying" :-) Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.