Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primedice

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the topic does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. North America1000 09:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Primedice

Primedice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another bitcoin online gambling site. Couldn't find anything significant in the way of sources that aren't blogs or press releases. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Added a casino.org source about hack. Thekid66 (talk) 06:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Thekid66 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Delete Nothing in the article suggesting notability, the refs are clearly generated by the site or its employees and one is a simple listing. Searches show nothing extra.  Velella  Velella Talk   18:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete lacks notability. Cabayi (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sources mention the subject in passing or as part of a phenomena, fails
    WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.