Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mark Zuckerberg#Personal life . (non-admin closure) ceradon (talk • contribs) 08:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg)

Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This individual does not appear to meet the

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk 21:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect to
  WP:NOTINHERITED. She gets some coverage there and is a possible search term but doesn't seem to have enough independent coverage for a standalone article. Valenciano (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect per above - all sources are from the perspective of the wife of Mark, no independent notability, and
  WP:NOTINHERITED. Widefox; talk 22:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Redirect to Mark_Zuckerberg#Personal_life. No claim of independent notability. I agree with editor ansh below that this is an improbable search term. --Bejnar (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  notability criteria. No need to create a separate article to represent her as Mark Zuckerberg's wife.--Chamith (talk) 03:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect. No offense to the subject, but what has she ever done by herself to gain notability? It can be described in Mark Zuckerberg#Personal life. – Epicgenius (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. Snow this. Per the above. Epeefleche (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I doubt this woman has been searched more than 100 time in the entirety of Wikipedia. It's like having an article for my cat. CombatWombat42 (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page was created on 23 December 2014; this article space had no hits (zero) for the previous 180 days, according to http://stats.grok.se/, but that may be because of its nonintuitive title. Nonetheless, I agree that there is no basis for the article. --Bejnar (talk) 09:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again - Still not notable enough for a stand alone article. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and merge to Mark Zuckerberg. Redirects are cheap and she may well become notable in the future. I copy edited a bit and corrected some errors about her education. She was a Harvard undergrad, and attended UCSF medical school. The article previously said she was a graduate of Harvard Medical School, which is clearly false. She lived in California during those years. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this title, because it's a very implausible and problematic title (at least the disambig aspect). I agree that other similar titles should be redirected but not this one. The page can be moved away first to preserve attribution if necessary. Note that the previous two AfDs on her were closed as delete, not redirect, as well. ansh666 02:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mark Zuckerberg. She's in that article, but not notable on her own. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mark Zuckerberg for obvious reasons; non-notable in her own right. Known publicly solely as Mark's wife.

AND

SALT!! Quis separabit? 19:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.