Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punchcut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Punchcut

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One Paragraph article. Nothing significant to add on Encyclopedia. Wiki is not for profile not a LinkedIn or directory. No indication of encyclopedia notability. Light2021 (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not meeting the GNG. (My delete is not contingent on the size of the article. Size does not matter.) There are, however, some dead links. If those could be revived and if they show significant coverage, I could reconsider. Working links show brief mentions and quotes of someone working for the company, and of course, press releases.Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a consulting company with 36 employees; hardly a claim to notability. I was not able to locate coverage to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails
-- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.