Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qazi Mohammad Obaidullah Alvi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete all j⚛e decker ^talk 01:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Qazi Mohammad Obaidullah Alvi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP lacking assertion of notability. Doesn't appear to be any RS about subject as sources fail verification for text they support, leaving a BLP with no sources for verification. (as another editor expressed on talk) Widefox; talk 07:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because:

same creator
WP:V
Atif Khalid Sati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) autobiography
photo in Qazi Mohammad Obaidullah Alvi links creator with nom'ed article - thus potential COI with subject's father:
Molana Mian Mohammed Abdullah Alvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Syed Fazal Husain Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - connection is at least source 1. is the an unreliable source by Qazi Mohammad Obaidullah Alvi
Political history of Circle Bakote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - again cannot verify, COI, appears political POV
other created articles just been PRODed, else I would bundle here:
- Molana Alvi Birotvi
- Abdurashid hadoti
Delete. Agree with nom; the lack of verifiable ref is a core policy failure (
WP:BIO, too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. No sign of passing
WP:Prof or anything else. Xxanthippe (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2014 (UTC).[reply
]

Delete. Per nom and Xxanthippe. SW3 5DL (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete —ШαмıQ✍ @ 09:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - AfD is bundle of several articles Widefox; talk 22:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
talk) 14:28, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
- Just look at
  talk) 15:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Comment See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atifsati Widefox; talk 16:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.