Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qazzoo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qazzoo

Qazzoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I deleted this as a prod, but then restored it following a request on my talk page. Original concern was "Written in a promotional tone like an advertisement." SpinningSpark 18:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 19:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 19:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 19:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- obvious spam & no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Baldly promotional and with no evidence of notability. --Lockley (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above. the sources are not RS. no significant coverage found on google.Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.